<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oily Math</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2005/08/oily-math/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2005/08/oily-math/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cruickshank</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2005/08/oily-math/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cruickshank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2005/08/30/oily-math/#comment-3111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all the American people realized that this is simply another giveaway of their resources and their land to giant self-serving corporations, there is no way that this proposal would be allowed to proceed.
That&#039;s aside from the fact that the oil will take 10 years to bring to market and will only satisfy the US&#039;s demand for oil for one year. More shocking than this is the fact that there is nothing in the current Energy Bill to reduce oil consumption.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all the American people realized that this is simply another giveaway of their resources and their land to giant self-serving corporations, there is no way that this proposal would be allowed to proceed.<br />
That&#8217;s aside from the fact that the oil will take 10 years to bring to market and will only satisfy the US&#8217;s demand for oil for one year. More shocking than this is the fact that there is nothing in the current Energy Bill to reduce oil consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cruickshank</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2005/08/oily-math/comment-page-1/#comment-5308</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cruickshank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2005/08/30/oily-math/#comment-5308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all the American people realized that this is simply another giveaway of their resources and their land to giant self-serving corporations, there is no way that this proposal would be allowed to proceed.
That&#039;s aside from the fact that the oil will take 10 years to bring to market and will only satisfy the US&#039;s demand for oil for one year. More shocking than this is the fact that there is nothing in the current Energy Bill to reduce oil consumption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all the American people realized that this is simply another giveaway of their resources and their land to giant self-serving corporations, there is no way that this proposal would be allowed to proceed.<br />
That&#8217;s aside from the fact that the oil will take 10 years to bring to market and will only satisfy the US&#8217;s demand for oil for one year. More shocking than this is the fact that there is nothing in the current Energy Bill to reduce oil consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaen sidney</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2005/08/oily-math/comment-page-1/#comment-3110</link>
		<dc:creator>jaen sidney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2005/08/30/oily-math/#comment-3110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The policy makers in Washington really aren&#039;t concerned with balancing the Federal budget or with the welfare of the American people. Much less do they care about the life &amp; health of the natural world. That FEMA&#039;s poor response to Katrina was due to its highest offices being held as sinecures by Bush family appointees is indicative of how much real concern this administration has for the success of even its purported intitiatives. So much for homeland security.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The policy makers in Washington really aren&#8217;t concerned with balancing the Federal budget or with the welfare of the American people. Much less do they care about the life &amp; health of the natural world. That FEMA&#8217;s poor response to Katrina was due to its highest offices being held as sinecures by Bush family appointees is indicative of how much real concern this administration has for the success of even its purported intitiatives. So much for homeland security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaen sidney</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2005/08/oily-math/comment-page-1/#comment-5307</link>
		<dc:creator>jaen sidney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2005/08/30/oily-math/#comment-5307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The policy makers in Washington really aren&#039;t concerned with balancing the Federal budget or with the welfare of the American people. Much less do they care about the life &amp; health of the natural world. That FEMA&#039;s poor response to Katrina was due to its highest offices being held as sinecures by Bush family appointees is indicative of how much real concern this administration has for the success of even its purported intitiatives. So much for homeland security.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The policy makers in Washington really aren&#8217;t concerned with balancing the Federal budget or with the welfare of the American people. Much less do they care about the life &amp; health of the natural world. That FEMA&#8217;s poor response to Katrina was due to its highest offices being held as sinecures by Bush family appointees is indicative of how much real concern this administration has for the success of even its purported intitiatives. So much for homeland security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
