<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warming to Cause Flock Shock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2007/11/warming-to-cause-flock-shock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2007/11/warming-to-cause-flock-shock/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2007/11/warming-to-cause-flock-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11289</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2007/11/29/warming-to-cause-flock-shock/#comment-11289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Schweiger, articles like this are one of the fundamental  negative actions that have the Global Warming (GW) theory crumbling as rapidly as it is.  

Since late 2007, over 1000 internationally-recognized  scientists have traveled to Washington, DC,
offering testimony against the IPCC  popularized version of climate catastrophe, brought on by increasing  atmospheric CO2.   1.6 F., over 100 years (and this figure is thought by many world authorities to have been substantially overstated by temperature data manipulation involving British IPCC scientists)-- is not a credible reason to turn the world into a giant field of death from starvation.

This was not connected to Michael Mann in any way. Mann was criticized by thousands of scientists, in abject anger that he continued to attempt disproving the scientifically well-grounded  climate period known as the Medieval Warm Period.  Of Course he failed, but continued to display his absurd &quot;Hockey Stick,&quot;  world climate chart --AS IF HE HAD DISPROVED THE MWP.

One of his former IPCC colleagues gibed: &quot;Michael could no more win at that attempt, than he could have disproved the existence of medieval Rome and London. 

AND, AS YOU SHOULD KNOW, SEVERAL OF THE IPCC&#039;s OWN SCIENTISTS, ASKED DR. MICHAEL TO  RESIGN FROM HIS POSITION, AND 3 OTHER SCIENTIST  (MAYBE MORE BY NOW) LEFT THE IPCC SYSTEM, &quot;IN PROFOUND EMBARRASSMENT.&quot; 

Please, Dr.Schweiger, instruct others as a committed scientist, not a politico.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Schweiger, articles like this are one of the fundamental  negative actions that have the Global Warming (GW) theory crumbling as rapidly as it is.  </p>
<p>Since late 2007, over 1000 internationally-recognized  scientists have traveled to Washington, DC,<br />
offering testimony against the IPCC  popularized version of climate catastrophe, brought on by increasing  atmospheric CO2.   1.6 F., over 100 years (and this figure is thought by many world authorities to have been substantially overstated by temperature data manipulation involving British IPCC scientists)&#8211; is not a credible reason to turn the world into a giant field of death from starvation.</p>
<p>This was not connected to Michael Mann in any way. Mann was criticized by thousands of scientists, in abject anger that he continued to attempt disproving the scientifically well-grounded  climate period known as the Medieval Warm Period.  Of Course he failed, but continued to display his absurd &#8220;Hockey Stick,&#8221;  world climate chart &#8211;AS IF HE HAD DISPROVED THE MWP.</p>
<p>One of his former IPCC colleagues gibed: &#8220;Michael could no more win at that attempt, than he could have disproved the existence of medieval Rome and London. </p>
<p>AND, AS YOU SHOULD KNOW, SEVERAL OF THE IPCC&#8217;s OWN SCIENTISTS, ASKED DR. MICHAEL TO  RESIGN FROM HIS POSITION, AND 3 OTHER SCIENTIST  (MAYBE MORE BY NOW) LEFT THE IPCC SYSTEM, &#8220;IN PROFOUND EMBARRASSMENT.&#8221; </p>
<p>Please, Dr.Schweiger, instruct others as a committed scientist, not a politico.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2007/11/warming-to-cause-flock-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2007/11/29/warming-to-cause-flock-shock/#comment-2448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is awesome!  I especially like the crafty word choices for the title. It makes a catchy read for a very important topic.
We must save the birds!!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome!  I especially like the crafty word choices for the title. It makes a catchy read for a very important topic.<br />
We must save the birds!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2007/11/warming-to-cause-flock-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-4768</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2007/11/29/warming-to-cause-flock-shock/#comment-4768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is awesome!  I especially like the crafty word choices for the title. It makes a catchy read for a very important topic.
We must save the birds!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome!  I especially like the crafty word choices for the title. It makes a catchy read for a very important topic.<br />
We must save the birds!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
