<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gulf Coast: A Long Road to Recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2010/08/the-gulf-coast-a-long-road-to-recovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2010/08/the-gulf-coast-a-long-road-to-recovery/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Pedigo</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2010/08/the-gulf-coast-a-long-road-to-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-12087</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Pedigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/nwfview/2010/08/the-gulf-coast-a-long-road-to-recovery/#comment-12087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was encouraged by the NWF view [Climate Science Under Attack: Who Speaks and Why, Aug./Sept. 2010]. However, I have a big problem with some of the advertisers in your publication. RV’s and Brazilian emeralds are, to me, a part of the problem. Yes, I know some organizations claim “independence” from their advertisers but the perceptions are still there and those perceptions are often negative. Remember, businesses advertise to gain customers and profit which can be used to vilify those scientists you spoke about in your editorial.
Seattle
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was encouraged by the NWF view [Climate Science Under Attack: Who Speaks and Why, Aug./Sept. 2010]. However, I have a big problem with some of the advertisers in your publication. RV’s and Brazilian emeralds are, to me, a part of the problem. Yes, I know some organizations claim “independence” from their advertisers but the perceptions are still there and those perceptions are often negative. Remember, businesses advertise to gain customers and profit which can be used to vilify those scientists you spoke about in your editorial.<br />
Seattle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
