<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tired of Arguing With Climate Change Skeptics?  Describe the Company You Keep!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2011/01/tired-of-arguing-with-climate-change-skeptics-describe-the-company-you-keep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/01/tired-of-arguing-with-climate-change-skeptics-describe-the-company-you-keep/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethax</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/01/tired-of-arguing-with-climate-change-skeptics-describe-the-company-you-keep/comment-page-1/#comment-7755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/?p=10940#comment-7755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Pepalis: I think you&#039;re missing the point, which is that there&#039;s been an effort to scare people away from understanding the scientific arguments for global warming by labeling anyone who does as left-wing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Pepalis: I think you&#8217;re missing the point, which is that there&#8217;s been an effort to scare people away from understanding the scientific arguments for global warming by labeling anyone who does as left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, Jan 6th 2011 &#171; The Daily Bayonet</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/01/tired-of-arguing-with-climate-change-skeptics-describe-the-company-you-keep/comment-page-1/#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, Jan 6th 2011 &#171; The Daily Bayonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/?p=10940#comment-6523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have found themselves friends at last - the CIA, the Joint Chiefs and CEO&#8217;s.  Wait, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have found themselves friends at last &#8211; the CIA, the Joint Chiefs and CEO&#8217;s.  Wait, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pepalis</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/01/tired-of-arguing-with-climate-change-skeptics-describe-the-company-you-keep/comment-page-1/#comment-6494</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pepalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/?p=10940#comment-6494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appeal to authority is not an argument, and without the Scientific Method, there is no Science. In simple terms, the Scientific Method consists of:
1. A documented, published (not necessarily in the politically-connected journals), testable hypothesis
2. A documented and published test, aka experiment, with fully documented and published supporting data and assumptions.
3. Third parties duplicate the published experiment and publish their results, data, etc.
4. Additional experiments are published with results, data, etc.
5. In many cases experiments (eventually) prove that the original hypothesis was invalid or just an approximation.
6. (In some cases, this process goes on long enough for us to label the hypothesis a Theory, or in rare cases, a Law)
7. See #5.

Steve Pepalis

ps: don&#039;t get me started on climate models (GIGO)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appeal to authority is not an argument, and without the Scientific Method, there is no Science. In simple terms, the Scientific Method consists of:<br />
1. A documented, published (not necessarily in the politically-connected journals), testable hypothesis<br />
2. A documented and published test, aka experiment, with fully documented and published supporting data and assumptions.<br />
3. Third parties duplicate the published experiment and publish their results, data, etc.<br />
4. Additional experiments are published with results, data, etc.<br />
5. In many cases experiments (eventually) prove that the original hypothesis was invalid or just an approximation.<br />
6. (In some cases, this process goes on long enough for us to label the hypothesis a Theory, or in rare cases, a Law)<br />
7. See #5.</p>
<p>Steve Pepalis</p>
<p>ps: don&#8217;t get me started on climate models (GIGO)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caro Molkenthin</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/01/tired-of-arguing-with-climate-change-skeptics-describe-the-company-you-keep/comment-page-1/#comment-6487</link>
		<dc:creator>Caro Molkenthin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/?p=10940#comment-6487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kevin Coyle,
my name is Carol and I&#039;m with a german nature conservancy ngo called Naturefund e.V.
Our great vision is to buy 3,5 million squarekilometers of land to protect it for nature. Besides that we inform about our projekts and interesting themes concerning climate, nature and biodiversity. For our english Website, I&#039;m always looking for interesting articles to publish and I would like to ask you If I might post this one on our page. look at www.naturefund.de to find the page.
I&#039;m looking forward to hearing from you,
greetings from Germany,Wiesbaden
Caro Mokenthin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin Coyle,<br />
my name is Carol and I&#8217;m with a german nature conservancy ngo called Naturefund e.V.<br />
Our great vision is to buy 3,5 million squarekilometers of land to protect it for nature. Besides that we inform about our projekts and interesting themes concerning climate, nature and biodiversity. For our english Website, I&#8217;m always looking for interesting articles to publish and I would like to ask you If I might post this one on our page. look at <a href="http://www.naturefund.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.naturefund.de</a> to find the page.<br />
I&#8217;m looking forward to hearing from you,<br />
greetings from Germany,Wiesbaden<br />
Caro Mokenthin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tdk</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/01/tired-of-arguing-with-climate-change-skeptics-describe-the-company-you-keep/comment-page-1/#comment-6462</link>
		<dc:creator>Tdk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/?p=10940#comment-6462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given that the standard argument is that all skeptics are bankrolled by big corporations, perhaps the second bullet point is not such a positive]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that the standard argument is that all skeptics are bankrolled by big corporations, perhaps the second bullet point is not such a positive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/01/tired-of-arguing-with-climate-change-skeptics-describe-the-company-you-keep/comment-page-1/#comment-6461</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 06:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/?p=10940#comment-6461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow - this is the weakest argument I&#039;ve heard yet for global warming.  Let&#039;s not debate the evidence and the science, let&#039;s look at the reactions of other people to the evidence and the science.  If I think the alarmists have overstated the sensitivity of climate to CO2 and have weak support for the belief that positive and not negative feedback will be the dominant factor, the fact that the chairman of the JCS had bought into it isn&#039;t going to sway me.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; this is the weakest argument I&#8217;ve heard yet for global warming.  Let&#8217;s not debate the evidence and the science, let&#8217;s look at the reactions of other people to the evidence and the science.  If I think the alarmists have overstated the sensitivity of climate to CO2 and have weak support for the belief that positive and not negative feedback will be the dominant factor, the fact that the chairman of the JCS had bought into it isn&#8217;t going to sway me.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
