<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed Rule Fails to Protect Central Texas Rivers and Bays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/04/proposed-rules-fail-to-protect-central-texas-rivers-and-bays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/04/proposed-rules-fail-to-protect-central-texas-rivers-and-bays/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanks for Providing a Strong Voice for Texas&#8217;s Natural Resources : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/04/proposed-rules-fail-to-protect-central-texas-rivers-and-bays/comment-page-1/#comment-14950</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanks for Providing a Strong Voice for Texas&#8217;s Natural Resources : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=53790#comment-14950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Quality (TCEQ) to safeguard the state’s fish and wildlife populations by strengthening a proposed environmental flow rule. As a result, over 3,000 Texans, including over 1,200 NWF members and supporters, sent letters to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quality (TCEQ) to safeguard the state’s fish and wildlife populations by strengthening a proposed environmental flow rule. As a result, over 3,000 Texans, including over 1,200 NWF members and supporters, sent letters to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
