<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Circuit Opinion 6-26-12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/appeals-court-upholds-epa-endangerment-finding-on-climate/dc-circuit-opinion-6-26-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/appeals-court-upholds-epa-endangerment-finding-on-climate/dc-circuit-opinion-6-26-12/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reactions to Greenhouse Gas Ruling &#171; Climate Denial Crock of the Week</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/appeals-court-upholds-epa-endangerment-finding-on-climate/dc-circuit-opinion-6-26-12/comment-page-1/#comment-16272</link>
		<dc:creator>Reactions to Greenhouse Gas Ruling &#171; Climate Denial Crock of the Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2012/06/DC-Circuit-Opinion-6-26-12.pdf#comment-16272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] an opinion issued yesterday, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia unanimously [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an opinion issued yesterday, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia unanimously [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BREAKING: U.S. Appeals Court Upholds EPA Greenhouse Gas &#8230; &#124; News</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/appeals-court-upholds-epa-endangerment-finding-on-climate/dc-circuit-opinion-6-26-12/comment-page-1/#comment-16229</link>
		<dc:creator>BREAKING: U.S. Appeals Court Upholds EPA Greenhouse Gas &#8230; &#124; News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2012/06/DC-Circuit-Opinion-6-26-12.pdf#comment-16229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the court’s opinion stated, “This is how science works. EPA is not required to re-prove the existence of the atom [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the court’s opinion stated, “This is how science works. EPA is not required to re-prove the existence of the atom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
