Comments on: Appeals Court Upholds EPA “Endangerment” Finding on Climate http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/appeals-court-upholds-epa-endangerment-finding-on-climate/ The National Wildlife Federation's blog Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:41:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Lorishermer http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/appeals-court-upholds-epa-endangerment-finding-on-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-16724 Lorishermer Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:39:00 +0000 http://blog.nwf.org/?p=61865#comment-16724 I dont know why. I have this feeling Mt. top removal is polluting the water

]]> By: Iallonardot http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/appeals-court-upholds-epa-endangerment-finding-on-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-16379 Iallonardot Mon, 02 Jul 2012 03:25:00 +0000 http://blog.nwf.org/?p=61865#comment-16379 Thanks for catching the error. I meant to write one year, not one week. Tony.

]]> By: Dan Galpern http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/appeals-court-upholds-epa-endangerment-finding-on-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-16241 Dan Galpern Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:06:00 +0000 http://blog.nwf.org/?p=61865#comment-16241 You note: “The case comes less
than a week after the U.S. Supreme Court in American Electric Power v.
Connecticut strongly reiterated the 2007 endangerment ruling stating, “Massachusetts made plain that emissions of carbon dioxide qualify as air pollution subject to regulation under the [Clean Air] Act”.”

Don’t you mean it comes less than 51 weeks after….?

]]>