<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NWF Says New Keystone XL Map Revisits Old Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/nwf-says-new-keystone-xl-map-revisits-old-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/nwf-says-new-keystone-xl-map-revisits-old-problems/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Keystone XL Pipeline Route to Steamroll Bald Eagles? : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/nwf-says-new-keystone-xl-map-revisits-old-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-17442</link>
		<dc:creator>New Keystone XL Pipeline Route to Steamroll Bald Eagles? : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=66023#comment-17442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] right through an American Bald Eagle nest. That&#8217;s right, the revised route &#8212; the one TransCanada told us we could trustto protect our wildlife, public lands and clean [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] right through an American Bald Eagle nest. That&#8217;s right, the revised route &#8212; the one TransCanada told us we could trustto protect our wildlife, public lands and clean [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/nwf-says-new-keystone-xl-map-revisits-old-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-17056</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=66023#comment-17056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lou, please read these articles on Keystone XL pipeline myths. One is by the Washington Post. The number of jobs TransCanada says the pipeline will create has been grossly exaggerated (and most are temporary). Also, the oil that will be transferred to the gulf coast are destined to go overseas. Texas refineries are serving GLOBAL demand.

http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/the-keystone-pipeline-myth-machine-2012-election-edition/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/2011/12/19/gIQApUAX8P_story.html

I do not support the pipeline because it is not safe (speaking of spillage of the raw tar sands in sensitive areas such as the precious Ogalala Aquifer in Nebraska), and it will set back progress made on addressing global warming issues. Burning one gallon of tar sands oil versus crude oil produces 5-15% more greenhouse gas emissions. Remember, James Hansen, NASA scientist and leading climate specialist, says approving this this pipeline would essentially be &quot;game over&quot; for the environment. Not worth it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou, please read these articles on Keystone XL pipeline myths. One is by the Washington Post. The number of jobs TransCanada says the pipeline will create has been grossly exaggerated (and most are temporary). Also, the oil that will be transferred to the gulf coast are destined to go overseas. Texas refineries are serving GLOBAL demand.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/the-keystone-pipeline-myth-machine-2012-election-edition/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/the-keystone-pipeline-myth-machine-2012-election-edition/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/2011/12/19/gIQApUAX8P_story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/2011/12/19/gIQApUAX8P_story.html</a></p>
<p>I do not support the pipeline because it is not safe (speaking of spillage of the raw tar sands in sensitive areas such as the precious Ogalala Aquifer in Nebraska), and it will set back progress made on addressing global warming issues. Burning one gallon of tar sands oil versus crude oil produces 5-15% more greenhouse gas emissions. Remember, James Hansen, NASA scientist and leading climate specialist, says approving this this pipeline would essentially be &#8220;game over&#8221; for the environment. Not worth it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/nwf-says-new-keystone-xl-map-revisits-old-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-17053</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=66023#comment-17053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nature and wildlife can coexist with economic growth!  I support the Keystone project, as it will create many needed jobs and reduce our dependency on middle east oil!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nature and wildlife can coexist with economic growth!  I support the Keystone project, as it will create many needed jobs and reduce our dependency on middle east oil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Keystone Pipeline Myth Machine &#8211; 2012 Election Edition : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/nwf-says-new-keystone-xl-map-revisits-old-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-16908</link>
		<dc:creator>The Keystone Pipeline Myth Machine &#8211; 2012 Election Edition : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=66023#comment-16908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] most important sources of freshwater for drinking and irrigation. In Nebraska, TransCanada’s proposed route cuts directly across the aquifer and through fragile ecosystems geologically similar to the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most important sources of freshwater for drinking and irrigation. In Nebraska, TransCanada’s proposed route cuts directly across the aquifer and through fragile ecosystems geologically similar to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
