<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arch Coal&#8217;s Otter Creek Mine Permit Application called &#8220;Deficient&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/arch-coals-otter-creek-mine-permit-application-called-deficient/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/arch-coals-otter-creek-mine-permit-application-called-deficient/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 05:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Northern Cheyenne Travel 1,200 Miles to Testify Against Coal Port : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/arch-coals-otter-creek-mine-permit-application-called-deficient/comment-page-1/#comment-17464</link>
		<dc:creator>Northern Cheyenne Travel 1,200 Miles to Testify Against Coal Port : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=69552#comment-17464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] from Montana brought to Spokane is that impacts to ALL of the communities, from the existing and proposed mines in the Powder River Basin to the ports on the West coast and all the rail communities in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Montana brought to Spokane is that impacts to ALL of the communities, from the existing and proposed mines in the Powder River Basin to the ports on the West coast and all the rail communities in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Voice Do We Have?: Environmental justice and the Tongue River Railroad : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/arch-coals-otter-creek-mine-permit-application-called-deficient/comment-page-1/#comment-17371</link>
		<dc:creator>What Voice Do We Have?: Environmental justice and the Tongue River Railroad : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 04:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=69552#comment-17371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is the community that is closest to the proposed Otter Creek coal mine and would also bear the extra burden of the proposed Tongue River Railroad. This community has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the community that is closest to the proposed Otter Creek coal mine and would also bear the extra burden of the proposed Tongue River Railroad. This community has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tongue River Railroad Tries Again: The Little Engine That Couldn&#8217;t, Part 1 : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/arch-coals-otter-creek-mine-permit-application-called-deficient/comment-page-1/#comment-17304</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tongue River Railroad Tries Again: The Little Engine That Couldn&#8217;t, Part 1 : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=69552#comment-17304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that the Tongue River Railroad Company must reapply for a permit to carry coal from the isolated Otter Creek coal tracts because their environmental analysis of the impacts of this rail line was inadequate, outdated and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the Tongue River Railroad Company must reapply for a permit to carry coal from the isolated Otter Creek coal tracts because their environmental analysis of the impacts of this rail line was inadequate, outdated and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
