<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keystone XL Review Fails the Climate Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/keystone-xl-review-fails-the-climate-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/keystone-xl-review-fails-the-climate-test/</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPA Slams &#8220;Insufficient&#8221; Keystone XL Review : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/keystone-xl-review-fails-the-climate-test/comment-page-1/#comment-18259</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA Slams &#8220;Insufficient&#8221; Keystone XL Review : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=72642#comment-18259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] what we&#8217;ve been saying all along: that this dangerous project was rushed from the start, without a thorough analysisof its impacts on the environment or public health. Tar sands and Keystone XL pose an enormous [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what we&#8217;ve been saying all along: that this dangerous project was rushed from the start, without a thorough analysisof its impacts on the environment or public health. Tar sands and Keystone XL pose an enormous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPA Slams &#8220;Insufficient&#8221; Keystone XL Review : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/keystone-xl-review-fails-the-climate-test/comment-page-1/#comment-18260</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA Slams &#8220;Insufficient&#8221; Keystone XL Review : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=72642#comment-18260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] what we&#8217;ve been saying all along: that this dangerous project was rushed from the start, without a thorough analysisof its impacts on the environment or public health. Tar sands and Keystone XL pose an enormous [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what we&#8217;ve been saying all along: that this dangerous project was rushed from the start, without a thorough analysisof its impacts on the environment or public health. Tar sands and Keystone XL pose an enormous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keystone XL &#8211; The Linchpin for Future Tar Sands Growth : Wildlife Promise</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/keystone-xl-review-fails-the-climate-test/comment-page-1/#comment-17957</link>
		<dc:creator>Keystone XL &#8211; The Linchpin for Future Tar Sands Growth : Wildlife Promise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=72642#comment-17957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this month, the U.S. State Department released its draft environmental review of Keystone XL to a storm of controversy. State concluded, wrongly, that the tar sands region will be developed regardless of whether or not [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this month, the U.S. State Department released its draft environmental review of Keystone XL to a storm of controversy. State concluded, wrongly, that the tar sands region will be developed regardless of whether or not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
