<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wildlife Promise &#187; Dan Siemann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/author/siemannd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Building in Floodplains a Good Idea?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/is-building-in-floodplains-a-good-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/is-building-in-floodplains-a-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Siemann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changing Course]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floodplains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Regional Center - Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puget Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=77513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Where will we put the next million people moving to Puget Sound?” I was asked this question recently by a business lobbyist concerned that new floodplain protection requirements would make building in flood-prone areas more difficult. His question was driven... <a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/is-building-in-floodplains-a-good-idea/" class="more">Read more &#62;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_49911" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/03/puget-sounds-vanishing-salmon/orca_porpoising/" rel="attachment wp-att-49911"><img class="size-medium wp-image-49911  " src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2012/03/Orca_porpoising-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Floodplain development is contributing to the demise of Puget Sound orcas. Photo: Minette Layne/WikiMedia Commons</p></div>“Where will we put the next million people moving to Puget Sound?” I was asked this question recently by a business lobbyist concerned that new floodplain protection requirements would make building in flood-prone areas more difficult. His question was driven by projections that the region’s population is projected to grow by 30% in the next 30 years. But his question also suggested that floodplains are a good place to construct new homes and businesses. Well, are they?</p>
<h2>The Costs of Flooding</h2>
<p><strong>Since 1990, Puget Sound has been ravaged by 15 major flood disasters</strong>—that’s more than one every other year. As outlined in our new report, <em><strong><a href="http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/Media-Center/Reports/Archive/2013/03-28-13-Changing-Course.aspx" target="_blank">Changing Course: Why Protecting Floodplains is Good for People and Wildlife</a></strong></em>, thousands of homes have been damaged or destroyed and at least 58 people have died due to flooding. These floods cost taxpayers more than $1.37 billion in clean up and recovery costs.</p>
<p>Humans are not the only ones affected by floodplain development.<strong> Since 1900, Puget Sound Chinook salmon populations have declined 93%</strong> and nine runs of Chinook have gone extinct. <strong>Orca whales, which eat primarily salmon, have declined by half</strong>. Both are now under federal protection through the Endangered Species Act, but habitat and populations continue to decline.</p>
<h2>Developing in Floodplains</h2>
<p><div id="attachment_77524" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/is-building-in-floodplains-a-good-idea/3uitscms_nxvu8mpgxjngjoxxrlzk_pnoiokvepbxuw/" rel="attachment wp-att-77524"><img class="size-medium wp-image-77524  " src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2013/03/3uITSCmS_Nxvu8MPGxJnGjOXxrlzK_PNoiOKVEpbXUw-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tolt River Road near Carnation, WA inundated by floodwaters. Photo: King County.</p></div>Floods are a natural occurrence, but flood damage needn’t be. One of the reasons Puget Sound experiences so much damage from flooding is that we’ve put so many people and buildings in harm’s way. More than 100,000 homes and business have been built in floodplains in this region.</p>
<p>By filling floodplains and leveeing rivers, we’ve diminished the ability of the land to absorb large storms. <strong>More than 90% of our floodplains and wetlands have been lost to development</strong>, agriculture and other human activities. Of the floodplains that remain, more than 70% are in poor condition. The result is an increase in devastating flood damage, degradation of Puget Sound, and steep declines in fish and wildlife populations.</p>
<h2>Solutions for Our Floodplains</h2>
<p>As scientists consider how to address salmon declines and larger storms, they are coming to the conclusion that protecting and restoring floodplains is one of the most important things we can do to help salmon and orca while reducing risk for people.</p>
<p>The first step is to <strong>prevent more harmful development in flood-prone areas</strong>. In other words, we must stop making the problem worse. The second step is to fix our past mistakes by repairing already damaged floodplains. We can do this by buying out frequently flooded properties, setting back or removing levees to widen the river and floodplain, and restoring floodplains to recreate critical ecological functions.</p>
<p>So, is putting Puget Sound’s next million people in floodplains a good idea? So far, building in floodplains has been bad for people, bad for taxpayers, and bad for fish and wildlife. The question should not be, where are we going to put the next million people. The question should be, where are we going to put them, <em>safely</em>?</p>
<p>Finding a safe home for Puget Sound’s next million people will mean building smarter. Restoring and protecting our floodplains will mean that Puget Sound’s next generation will not just be safer from floods; they will also still be able to see salmon and orca leaping from our waters.</p>
<p>For more information, be sure to read our report: <strong><em><a href="http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/Media-Center/Reports/Archive/2013/03-28-13-Changing-Course.aspx" target="_blank">Changing Course: Why Protecting Floodplains is Good for People and Wildlife</a></em>,</strong> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3lJmSQG9LE&amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">watch our video here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nwf.org/2013/03/is-building-in-floodplains-a-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Path Forward for Salmon in the Columbia River Basin</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/a-new-path-forward-for-salmon-in-the-columbia-river-basin/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/a-new-path-forward-for-salmon-in-the-columbia-river-basin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Siemann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Northwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelhead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=67439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wild salmon and steelhead of the Columbia and Snake Rivers are truly one-of-a-kind. Many of these fish travel farther inland and higher in elevation than any salmon in the world, returning to some of the best-protected salmon habitat on... <a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/a-new-path-forward-for-salmon-in-the-columbia-river-basin/" class="more">Read more &#62;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wild salmon and steelhead of the Columbia and Snake Rivers are truly one-of-a-kind. Many of these fish travel farther inland and higher in elevation than any salmon in the world, returning to some of the best-protected salmon habitat on the planet in central Idaho and northeastern Oregon.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_67449" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 630px"><a href="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2012/10/Jumping_Salmon_USFWS.jpeg"><img class="size-large wp-image-67449 " src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2012/10/Jumping_Salmon_USFWS-620x413.jpeg" alt="" width="620" height="413" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber is pushing for a new approach to restoring salmon to Northwestern rivers and streams. Photo by U.S. FWS.</p></div>Recovering imperiled wild salmon and steelhead in the Columbia-Snake Basin has been stalled for nearly two decades, but now there is new hope. Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber recently called for a new approach to fixing the problems facing salmon and people in the Columbia-Snake River Basin, and he urged others to join him.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://online.nwf.org/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;id=1671&amp;s_src=WildilfePromise"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-39678 " src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2011/12/ActionButton1.png" alt="Take Action" width="200" height="34" /></a>Please add your support today with a message to decision-makers. <strong><a title="Turn the Tide for Northwest Salmon " href="http://online.nwf.org/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;id=1671&amp;s_src=WildilfePromise" target="_blank">Tell the Administration to Act Now to Save Columbia-Snake River Salmon</a>!</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>With thirteen salmon and steelhead populations—and thousands of salmon-related jobs—at risk, twenty years of litigation over failed federal salmon plans, and more than $10 billion spent, the governor is proposing a different path forward. He is advocating a stakeholder-driven process to develop a plan that restores salmon and steelhead, creates jobs, invests in regional communities, and reduces the persistent uncertainty facing many businesses in Oregon and the Pacific Northwest.</p>
<h2>A Stakeholder-Driven Process Might be Salmon&#8217;s Best Hope</h2>
<p>Governor Kitzhaber thinks that the establishment of an inclusive stakeholder process may be the best way to craft a comprehensive, long-term salmon plan that works for both salmon and people. And he is asking other elected leaders in the Northwest and in Washington, D.C., to join him in making it a reality.</p>
<p>The governor published an <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2012/09/we_can_end_the_columbia_basin.html">op-ed</a> on Sept 22nd in which he said, “By gathering the parties around a table, and working in good faith to reach common ground on a fisheries plan that is supported by sound science, we can come to the 2014 [court-ordered] deadline with a historic agreement that ends the 20-year chapter of salmon wars in the Columbia basin, an agreement that protects fish while maintaining our supply of clean and affordable energy.</p>
<p>While Governor Kitzhaber’s recent push is highly visible, he is not alone in seeking a new path forward. Tens of thousands of citizens, more than a thousand businesses, and scores of state and federal lawmakers have expressed similar support for a new approach that brings together the affected interests in the region to work together on an effective, science-based plan that restores Columbia Basin salmon and invests in Northwest communities and the economy.</p>
<p>Learn more about this “<a title="Solutions Table for Salmon Restoration" href="http://www.wildsalmon.org/projects/solutions-table/a-solutions-table-for-columbia-snake-basin-salmon.html" target="_blank">solutions table</a>” for Columbia-Snake salmon.</p>
<h2>Restoration Plans Mired in the Political Muck<strong></strong></h2>
<p>For many years, efforts to restore salmon to this important watershed have proven both elusive and contentious. National Wildlife Federation initiated litigation in the early 1990s, following the listing of Snake River sockeye salmon under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Since then, twelve additional stocks of salmon and steelhead in the Columbia Basin have been listed as threatened or endangered, and four of five federal plans developed by the federal government have been rejected as inadequate by the courts, most recently in 2011.</p>
<p>Commercial, sport, and tribal fishing communities and outdoor retail companies have been hit particularly hard by constrained fisheries and limited recreational opportunities and the loss of jobs and income caused by salmon population declines. Recovering salmon and steelhead to healthy, harvestable populations will restore thousands of jobs in the region’s salmon economy that have been lost in the last several decades. <strong>The development of an effective, science-based plan that has the support of the region’s leaders and stakeholders will increase certainty and help Northwest businesses and communities plan successfully for the future</strong>.</p>
<p>The question of whether to remove the lower Snake River dams in order to protect an irreplaceable Northwest icon has long been at the center of the debate on restoring salmon. Hundreds of fisheries biologists, including the Western Division of the American Fisheries Society (AFS), and dozens of studies have <a href="http://www.wildsalmon.org/facts-and-information/science/" target="_blank">concluded that the removal of the lower Snake River dams</a> in eastern Washington must be part of any effective Columbia Basin restoration plan. Today, all remaining stocks in the Snake River—sockeye, steelhead, fall Chinook, and spring-summer Chinook—are listed under the ESA.</p>
<h2>The Impacts of Climate Change also Hamper Recovery</h2>
<p>Steadily rising water temperatures in the Columbia and Snake Rivers as a result of a warming climate and dam-restricted flow are increasing the scrutiny of these dams. Water temperatures in the lower Snake and lower Columbia exceeded 70 degrees for much of this summer—frequently violating Clean Water Act standards and harming salmon and steelhead migrating to and from the ocean.</p>
<p>A free-flowing lower Snake River would significantly lower water temperatures in both the Snake and Columbia rivers, and reconnect Snake River fish to pristine habitat in the mountains of central Idaho, in places like the Salmon River and Redfish Lake. Many of these high elevation refuges—though largely inaccessible for salmon today—are being called the Noah’s Ark for salmon in a world of climate change. <strong>Many of these areas remain cold and snowy for much of the year, and thus provide salmon the cold, clear water that they depend upon.</strong></p>
<p>Restoring wild salmon and steelhead in the Columbia and Snake Rivers remains an essential job and shared goal for the people of the Northwest and the nation. These fish represent critical threads in the Northwest’s economic, ecological, and cultural fabric: feeding ecosystems and people, sustaining jobs and ways of life.</p>
<p>With so much at stake, salmon and fishing advocates enthusiastically welcome Governor Kitzhaber’s call for a new approach, for a coming together of both allies and adversaries, to begin repairing what is broken in the Columbia Basin, in a manner that works for both salmon and people.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>You can add your voice by taking action today: <a href="http://online.nwf.org/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&amp;id=1671&amp;s_src=WildilfePromise">Tell the Administration to Act Now to Save Columbia-Snake River Salmon</a>!</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/10/a-new-path-forward-for-salmon-in-the-columbia-river-basin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
