<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wildlife Promise &#187; drilling safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/tags/drilling-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do we need to hold a bake sale to fund drilling rig inspections?</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/04/do-we-need-to-hold-a-bake-sale-to-fund-drilling-rig-inspections/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/04/do-we-need-to-hold-a-bake-sale-to-fund-drilling-rig-inspections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter LaFontaine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOEMRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepwater Horizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore drilling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/?p=19551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A year after the Gulf oil spill, Congress has not passed a single bill to make offshore drilling safer. But they have managed to screw up the one slam-dunk item in the recent budget deal, setting aside only $47 million... <a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2011/04/do-we-need-to-hold-a-bake-sale-to-fund-drilling-rig-inspections/" class="more">Read more &#62;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A year after the Gulf oil spill, Congress has not passed a single bill to make offshore drilling safer. </strong>But they have managed to screw up the one slam-dunk item in the recent budget deal, setting aside only $47 million for the agency that oversees that industry—<em>less than half of what the President requested.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_19554" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-19554" href="http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2011/04/do-we-need-to-hold-a-bake-sale-to-fund-drilling-rig-inspections/4773815181_6732bf673f/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-19554 " src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wildlifepromise/files/2011/04/4773815181_6732bf673f-300x175.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="175" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Thousands of ships were deployed to help with containment efforts last April   (photo: DVIDSHUB/flickr)</p></div>
<p>Now, that might still sound like a lot of cash, but it’s pocket change when you put it in context:</p>
<ul>
<li>In the 4<sup>th</sup> quarter of 2010, BP had a <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2011/02/01/bp-quarterly-profit.html">$5.6 billion</a> profit – meaning they made almost $62 million every day.</li>
<li>The <em>Deepwater Horizon</em> rig cost <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2066233,00.html">$560 million</a> to build.</li>
<li>Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson made <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9MIUJ202.htm">$21.5 million</a> last year.</li>
</ul>
<p>I mean, $47 million is what the New York Yankees’ Alex Rodriguez and Derek Jeter will make this season!  <strong>But Congress decided that their cost-cutting frenzy was more important than ensuring the safety of rig workers, wildlife, and the residents of the Gulf coast, so now officials are scrambling to do twice as much with half the resources. </strong>Michael Bromwich, the director of the Bureau of Oceam Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) <a href="http://www.boemre.gov/ooc/press/2011/press0419.htm">said yesterday</a> that his agency was “under-resourced and outmatched by industry,” and warned that the slashed budget “won’t allow us to improve operations for the future to the extent – and in the ways – that we think are desirable and necessary.”</p>
<blockquote><p>“We desperately need more engineers, inspectors and other safety personnel.  We desperately need more environmental scientists and more personnel to do environmental analysis.  We desperately need more personnel to help us with the permitting process.  And much more.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to get too dramatic, but Congress should be ashamed of itself. <strong> Members of the House of Representatives are fast-tracking bills that would <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/04/14/14greenwire-house-gop-scores-early-victory-in-offshore-dri-77607.html">speed up offshore drilling</a> and <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/7529009.html">weaken safeguards</a>, but they can’t be bothered to pay for safety inspections and it’s obvious they’ve written off the chance of another spill happening. </strong>We need the exact opposite: better regulation, better funding for safety measures, and a more cautious approach to drilling.</p>
<p>Learn more about NWF’s work in the Gulf, including our efforts to protect wildlife and habitat, at <a href="http://www.nwf.org/oilspill">www.nwf.org/oilspill</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/04/do-we-need-to-hold-a-bake-sale-to-fund-drilling-rig-inspections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP: Always Sticking Up For the Little Guys</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/03/bp-always-sticking-up-for-the-little-guys/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/03/bp-always-sticking-up-for-the-little-guys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter LaFontaine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dudley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf of Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Hayward]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/?p=15725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since replacing Tony Hayward (he of yachting fame and foot-in-mouth syndrome) as BP’s chief executive, Bob Dudley has mostly stayed out of the limelight.  But Dudley stirred up memories of his old boss yesterday by addressing the “liability cap” on... <a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2011/03/bp-always-sticking-up-for-the-little-guys/" class="more">Read more &#62;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since replacing Tony Hayward (he of <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/06/19/eveningnews/main6598907.shtml">yachting</a> fame and <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7910167/BPs-Tony-Hayward-the-gaffes.html">foot-in-mouth syndrome</a>) as BP’s chief executive, Bob Dudley has mostly stayed out of the limelight.  But Dudley stirred up memories of his old boss yesterday by addressing the “liability cap” on offshore drillers.</p>
<p>The cap is a pretty simple concept: it limits the amount of money a driller has to pay in the event of an accident.   Right now the cap is set at $75 million, so a company like BP is only liable for $75 million in economic damages from their massive disaster.  They still have to pay cleanup costs and penalties for the oil they spilled, but aren’t legally bound to compensate folks like, say, the restaurant owner whose seafood supply was suddenly cut off, or the hotel staff who were laid off because tourists stayed home.</p>
<div id="attachment_15727" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-15727" href="http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2011/03/bp-always-sticking-up-for-the-little-guys/snapper/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15727" src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wildlifepromise/files/2011/03/snapper-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Oil spill make it so you can&#039;t buy fish for your restaurant?  Too bad.  (photo: Steve Linder)</p></div>
<p>Under heavy pressure from President Obama, BP set up a fund to cover some of these damages, but many Gulf residents have been <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/01/bp-lawyer-gulf-spill-disaster-claims">turned away</a> or forced to endure long waits.  And according to a <a href="http://www.oilspillcommission.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Liability%20and%20Compensation%20Under%20the%20Oil%20Pollution%20Act.pdf">report</a> from the federal Oil Spill Commission, &#8220;If a company with less financial means had caused the spill, the company would likely have declared bankruptcy long before paying anything close to the damages caused.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>The obvious solution to this problem is to raise or eliminate the liability cap.  It’s a matter of accountability—if you knew you could wreck your rental car and only pay a $75 penalty, I bet you would go a little heavy on the gas pedal.</strong></p>
<p>But BP is trying to make it about an altogether different issue: in a National Journal <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/bp-chief-skirts-oil-liability-issue-at-cera-conference-20110309">article</a> yesterday (subscription required) Dudley was quoted as saying “The tough question is: How many companies do you want operating in the Gulf’s deep water? The higher the liability cap gets, the fewer companies that will operate in the Gulf.”</p>
<p><strong>Well yeah, Bob…that’s true, but it’s not like deepwater drilling is exactly a mom-and-pop industry. </strong>We’re talking about some of the most expensive equipment in history—according to Michael Kearns of the National Ocean Industries Association, <strong>a deepwater rig can cost $600,000 a day to operate.  The little guys simply can’t afford to play the game in the first place.</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_15728" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-15728" href="http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2011/03/bp-always-sticking-up-for-the-little-guys/bob-dudley/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-15728" src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wildlifepromise/files/2011/03/Bob-Dudley-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">BP&#039;s Dudley: &quot;Don&#039;t chase off the little guys!&quot; (photo: BP America)</p></div>
<p>Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but Congress is taking its sweet time bringing liability legislation up for a vote.  So long, in fact, that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/02/28/28greenwire-interior-issues-first-new-deepwater-permit-11352.html">new deepwater permits</a> are being issued without a new law in place.  When the bill eventually takes shape, it’s likely to create a two-part system with one cap for deepwater rigs and another, cheaper cap for shallow water rigs.  The idea there is that smaller companies already operate in shallow water and folks don’t want to chase them out of the Gulf.  Also, as we witnessed so painfully last summer, it’s a LOT harder to stop a spill five thousand feet below the ocean surface than it is in shallow water.  <strong>We need a bill that forces drillers to make safety, not speed, the priority.</strong></p>
<p>Big Oil is fond of saying they have a good safety record (a slightly absurd claim, <a href="http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/Media-Center/News-by-Topic/Global-Warming/2010/07-28-10-Oil-Disasters-Report.aspx">according to the numbers</a>) but if that’s true, what do they have to fear about accountability?  <strong>The fact is these companies know they were incredibly lucky to avoid a major spill for so long, and they grew accustomed to easy profits while taxpayers carried all the risk.</strong></p>
<p>Oh, and that new deepwater well that’s being drilled?  BP owns half of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nwf.org/2011/03/bp-always-sticking-up-for-the-little-guys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
