<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wildlife Promise &#187; elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/tags/elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:21:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Voters Want Answers on Climate from President Obama and Governor Romney</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/voters-want-answers-on-climate-from-president-obama-and-governor-romney/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/voters-want-answers-on-climate-from-president-obama-and-governor-romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=67067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Undecided voters are not hearing what they want to hear from the candidates right now on climate change. A new poll by Yale University and George Mason University found that undecided voters are concerned about climate change and it could... <a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/voters-want-answers-on-climate-from-president-obama-and-governor-romney/" class="more">Read more &#62;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/global-warming-2012-election"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-67068 " src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2012/09/climate-change-in-the-american-mind-cover-232x300.jpeg" alt="" width="232" height="300" /></a>Undecided voters are not hearing what they want to hear from the candidates right now on climate change. A new poll by Yale University and George Mason University found that <a title="The Potential Impact of Global Warming on the 2012 Presidential Election" href="http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/global-warming-2012-election/" target="_blank">undecided voters are concerned about climate change</a> and it <strong>could be a factor in their voting this fall</strong>. According to the Yale-GMU poll, 55 percent of undecided voters say the candidates’ views on climate will be among several important issues that help guide their vote.</p>
<p>Interestingly, this poll finds that <strong>most undecided voters believe global warming is happening</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Most undecided likely voters (80%) believe that global warming is happening, while only 3% say it is not happening – which is very similar to likely Obama voters (86% and 4%, respectively).</p>
<p>Undecideds are markedly different than likely Romney voters, fewer than half of whom believe global warming is happening (45%).</p></blockquote>
<p>This new national survey found that 7% of likely voters remain undecided about whom they will vote for President. Voters are demanding information from candidates on how they plan to fight climate change. Given how close the election for president may turn out to be in key states, this should be a wake up call for the candidates to voice their plans.</p>
<p>Voters are also raising expectations for lawmakers to take <strong>action on climate change</strong>, as noted by <em>The Hill&#8217;s</em> <a title="Poll: Swing voters want more from Obama, Congress on climate" href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/251259-poll-swing-voters-want-more-from-obama-congress-on-climate" target="_blank">Energy &amp; Envronment blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sixty-four percent of undecided voters believe Obama should be doing more to address climate change, and 72 percent say Congress should be doing more.</p></blockquote>
<p>Want to know how you can help elevate climate change and conservation issues this fall? Read about the <a title="Special Report: Where the Presidential Candidates Stand on Conservation" href="http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/National-Wildlife/Animals/Archives/2012/Presidential-Candidates-and-Conservation.aspx">candidates&#8217; views on conservation</a>, and pledge to <a title="Pledge to Vote Wildlife-friendly this Year" href="https://online.nwf.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=1661&amp;s_src=WildlifePromise">Vote Wildlife Friendly</a> during the upcoming election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/09/voters-want-answers-on-climate-from-president-obama-and-governor-romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polluters Pour Millions Into November Elections</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2010/09/polluters-pour-millions-into-november-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nwf.org/2010/09/polluters-pour-millions-into-november-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miles Grant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Get Involved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polluters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/wildlifepromise/2010/09/polluters-pour-millions-into-november-elections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday here at Wildlife Promise, we detailed how polluters have spent more than $200 million on lobbying already this year, trying to block any effort to limit global warming pollution. A reader wrote in to ask how much polluters are... <a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2010/09/polluters-pour-millions-into-november-elections/" class="more">Read more &#62;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday here at Wildlife Promise, we detailed how polluters have spent <a href="http://blogs.nwf.org/arctic_promise/2010/09/deja-ruse-coal-front-groups-roll-out-astroturf-on-capitol-hill.html">more than $200 million on lobbying</a> already this year, trying to block any effort to limit global warming pollution. A reader wrote in to ask how much polluters are giving directly to politicians in this year&#8217;s midterm elections.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org"><img class="alignright" src="http://images.opensecrets.org/os_logo.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="56" align="left" /></a></p>
<p>Courtesy of OpenSecrets.org, we can see polluters have already given <strong>more than $27 million</strong> to candidates for office this fall:</p>
<ul>
<li>Oil &amp; Gas Industry: <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=E01++&amp;goButt2.x=9&amp;goButt2.y=5&amp;goButt2=Submit">$13,036,908</a></li>
<li>Electric Utilities: <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=E08&amp;recipdetail=A&amp;sortorder=U&amp;cycle=2010">$12,173,516</a></li>
<li>Coal Mining: <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=E1210&amp;goButt2.x=9&amp;goButt2.y=8&amp;goButt2=Submit">$1,900,528</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Polluters still have another 7 weeks before the November elections to add to these staggering totals. For comparison&#8217;s sake:</p>
<ul>
<li>Conservation Groups: <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=Q11++&amp;goButt2.x=14&amp;goButt2.y=3&amp;goButt2=Submit">$1,210,401</a></li>
<li>Alternative Energy Industry: <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=E1500&amp;goButt2.x=8&amp;goButt2.y=7&amp;goButt2=Submit">$704,481</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Political scientists often mention a chicken-or-the-egg question when it comes to donations &#8212; do politicians support industry positions because those industries donate to them? Or do industries donate to politicians who are already supportive of their positions? Big polluters seem to have their bases covered no matter what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nwf.org/2010/09/polluters-pour-millions-into-november-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
