<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wildlife Promise &#187; Richard Nixon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwf.org/tags/richard-nixon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwf.org</link>
	<description>The National Wildlife Federation&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Congress&#8217; Latest Attack on the Environment Ensnares Elvis</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/congress-latest-attack-on-the-environment-ensnares-elvis/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/congress-latest-attack-on-the-environment-ensnares-elvis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Iallonardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elvis presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keystone xl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nepa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overton park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tranportation bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/?p=61681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Last year, Congress voted 191 times against the environment.  This year isn&#8217;t likely to be any better. It wasn&#8217;t always like that.  Since 1970, we’ve had a bipartisan law that requires federal agencies to conduct comprehensive assessments of the... <a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/congress-latest-attack-on-the-environment-ensnares-elvis/" class="more">Read more &#62;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><div id="attachment_61682" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/congress-latest-attack-on-the-environment-ensnares-elvis/nixon-elvis/" rel="attachment wp-att-61682"><img class="size-medium wp-image-61682 " src="http://b50ym1n8ryw31pmkr4671ui1c64.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/11/files/2012/06/nixon-elvis-288x300.jpg" alt="" width="288" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The King and the President meet in 1970. Months before, Mr. Nixon signed the bipartisan National Environmental Policy Act into law. For decades its saved important and special places, including hallowed ground for Elvis fans. Image from archives.gov.</p></div><span style="font-size: small">Last year, <a href="http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?q=news/new-report-details-the-most-anti-environment-house-in-the-history-of-congress">Congress voted 191 times against the environment</a>.  This year isn&#8217;t likely to be any better. It wasn&#8217;t always like that.  </span><span style="font-size: small">Since 1970, we’ve had a bipartisan law that requires federal agencies to conduct comprehensive assessments of the environmental impacts of major activities undertaken or funded by the federal government.  It is called the National Environmental Protection Act, often known by its acronym, NEPA.  It&#8217;s a fundamental bedrock of American conservation.  And it&#8217;s more than that.  It helped saved the hallowed ground where the King, Elvis Presley, gave his first performance in 1954.  </span></p>
<h1><span style="font-size: small">How NEPA Conserves</span></h1>
<p><span style="font-size: small">If the federal government is involved in expanding a highway, for example, the agency must (1) tell the public how that highway and its use will impact air, water, wildlife, wetlands and other natural resources and (2) involve the public in reviewing those impacts by inviting public comment and analysis.  Fortunately, “the public” means all the stakeholders, from the bulldozer operators to local governments to paddlers.  So it&#8217;s about even more than conservation &#8211; it&#8217;s about transparency in government, and democratic participation.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">NEPA does not mandate a particular decision.  It just requires decision-makers to make a thorough examination of the environmental impacts, consider the impacts and look at alternatives. <strong>It prevents corruption. bias and mistakes.  NEPA is a no-brainer</strong>. The basic premise is to help everyone understand what natural resources are there and what would be affected by the proposed action, be it a highway, a dam or expansion of an airport runway.  Know before you act.  </span></p>
<h1><strong><span style="font-size: small">NEPA Now Ensnared in Beltway Politics</span></strong></h1>
<p>How things have changed since 1970 though.  Some in Congress, at the behest of industries that would prefer to railroad projects with environmental consequences through, think it&#8217;s time to gut NEPA.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">Federal legislators are now negotiating a transportation bill in a joint House of Represenatives-Senate conference committee and <strong>some in Congress are trying to gut some of NEPA’s most important provisions. </strong> One measure would eliminate the public involvement and comment involved in the environmental review of proposed federal highway projects.  Another would allow states to buy right-of-way for “long-range needs” and capacity for expansion for a 50- to 100-year period and then allow them to avoid environmental review for any projects carried out within that previously obtained right-of-way. This means that many miles of new roads could be built without any environmental review, with little information on environmental impacts and without any requirement to address citizens’ concerns.</span></p>
<h1><strong><span style="font-size: small">The Elvis-NEPA Connection</span></strong></h1>
<p><span style="font-size: small">The King didn&#8217;t know it when he met President Nixon, but the 1970 landmark law would save some hallowed rock and roll ground.   In the 1960s and 1970s, some highway planners wanted to use 26 acres of the 342-acre Overton Park in Memphis to build <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_Highway_40" href="redir.aspx?C=0b57ea964b2e42459a50ad0024e813b0&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fInterstate_Highway_40" target="_blank">Interstate Highway 40</a> to speed suburban commuters’ trips to downtown. Local residents formed a group called <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_to_Preserve_Overton_Park" href="redir.aspx?C=0b57ea964b2e42459a50ad0024e813b0&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fCitizens_to_Preserve_Overton_Park" target="_blank">Citizens to Preserve Overton Park</a> and challenged the plan in court in what became one of the most famous cases in environmental law. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">Ultimately, the <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Supreme_Court" href="redir.aspx?C=0b57ea964b2e42459a50ad0024e813b0&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fUnited_States_Supreme_Court" target="_blank">United States Supreme Court</a> ruled in their favor in <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_to_Preserve_Overton_Park_v._Volpe" href="redir.aspx?C=0b57ea964b2e42459a50ad0024e813b0&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fCitizens_to_Preserve_Overton_Park_v._Volpe" target="_blank"><em>Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe</em></a>.<a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_Park#cite_note-4" href="redir.aspx?C=0b57ea964b2e42459a50ad0024e813b0&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fOverton_Park%23cite_note-4" target="_blank"><sup>[5]</sup></a>  The case helped define for decades and maybe generations how citizen groups have a right to organize and have their concerns heard before federal agencies set out to make controversial and potentially destructive decisions. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">Now to Elvis.  The famous Shell Theatre is in Overton Park and that is where <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvis_Presley" href="redir.aspx?C=0b57ea964b2e42459a50ad0024e813b0&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fElvis_Presley" target="_blank">Elvis Presley</a> gave his first paid concert on July 30, 1954.  NEPA helped galvanize the community, and ensure a wise decision was made. Shell still stands today, and it remains a <a href="http://levittshell.org/history.php">cultural hub in Overton Park</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small">“Don’t Be Cruel,” Elvis crooned.  Listen up, Congress.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nwf.org/2012/06/congress-latest-attack-on-the-environment-ensnares-elvis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty Politics for Dirty Fuels</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwf.org/2009/08/dirty-politics-for-dirty-fuels/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nwf.org/2009/08/dirty-politics-for-dirty-fuels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larry Schweiger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prince william sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Perriello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwf.org/nwfview/2009/08/08/dirty-politics-for-dirty-fuels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(as published in National Wildlife Federation’s National Wildlife, Aug/Sept. 2009) Many of you wrote letters and placed phone calls to your members of Congress in support of the American Clean Energy and Security Act to protect wildlife from global warming,... <a href="http://blog.nwf.org/2009/08/dirty-politics-for-dirty-fuels/" class="more">Read more &#62;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: x-small">(as published in <a href="http://www.nwf.org/NationalWildlife/article.cfm?issueID=130&amp;articleID=1766">National Wildlife Federation’s <em>National Wildlife</em>, Aug/Sept. 2009</a>)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: x-small"> </span><span style="font-family: Verdana"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: x-small"><span style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: x-small"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: x-small"><span style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: x-small"> </span></span>Many of you wrote letters and placed phone calls to your members of Congress in support of the American Clean Energy and Security Act to protect wildlife from global warming, create clean-energy jobs and improve the nation’s energy security. As a result, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the bill on the eve of the 4th of July weekend. It was a close fight, and every letter and call counted.</p>
<p>While letters were pouring in from real voters like you who want a new energy future, a surprising number of calls and faxes were being sent to undecided lawmakers from phone numbers outside of their districts urging a vote against the bill. Virginia Congressman Tom Perriello received a letter that supposedly was sent from a local chapter of the NAACP, asking him to oppose the measure. On further investigation, Perriello discovered that this letter along with five others purportedly sent from different organizations were all forgeries. It was a fraud that corrupted the very heart of America’s democracy—the connection between members of Congress and their constituents.</p>
<p>In reality, the NAACP recently joined in partnership with the National Wildlife Federation to support passage of the legislation. During their Centennial Convention in July, NAACP delegates recognized the economic opportunities that will flow from global warming solutions, stating in a resolution that &#8220;solving the climate crisis can create 5 million ‘green’ jobs that will be in places where they are needed most.&#8221;</p>
<p>The fake NAACP letter and other phony messages sent to lawmakers were products of outright deception created by companies such as Bonner &amp; Associates, a lobbying group known to create &#8220;strategic grassroots&#8221;—an artificial version of grassroots lobbying known in Washington, D.C., as &#8220;Astroturf.&#8221;</p>
<p>In recent years, large corporate interests have successfully deceived Congress and the public by paying for such Astroturf campaigns. Here is how it’s done: Corporations hire firms like Bonner &amp; Associates, which in turn make up fake organizational names or borrow real organizations’ letterheads, hire professional callers who improperly identify themselves with made-up groups and urge unsuspecting residents to call their members of Congress to oppose important reform legislation that they misrepresent as bad. Bonner &amp; Associates refused to reveal its corporate clients that funded their deception, but the firm has represented a number of big energy companies in the past. Congress is now investigating their activities.</p>
<p>This is merely the latest fraud by the major energy companies to mislead the public. On a recent visit to Prince William Sound in Alaska, I saw scientifically-collected samples that demonstrate much of the oil from the 1989 <em>Exxon Valdez</em> spill remains where it went when it was washed off the surface of the rocks. It continues to damage fish and wildlife habitat and contaminate our food chain. The oiled sound is no longer the pristine place it once was and most of the canneries in the town of Cordova are gone.</p>
<p>When the pipeline and port in Prince William Sound were built, the oil industry promised President Nixon they would have a response team, oil booms and other equipment ready to address any spill that might occur. They didn’t.</p>
<p>In the days after the accident, as the oil spread more than 800 miles through the sound and along the Alaska Coast, Exxon promised to clean it up and make the 30,000 people living in the region’s fishing villages &#8220;whole.&#8221; They did neither. Instead, Exxon cheated innocent people of their livelihoods. For the next 20 years, the company fought bankrupt fishermen, cannery owners and other innocent victims all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In the end, Exxon paid only pennies on the dollars lost. Many of the original victims died waiting; others lost everything dear to them.</p>
<p>There is an often-repeated quote, first attributed to President Abraham Lincoln, that says, <em>&#8220;You may fool all of the people some of the time, you can even fool some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.&#8221;</em> Well, the executives of big oil along with the dirty coal industry believe they can fool all Americans all the time.</p>
<p>Oil companies will do everything they can to stop the clean energy and climate legislation passed in the House from advancing in the Senate. Once again, we expect a close vote. Call your two U.S. Senators, tell them that you are a real constituent and urge them to pass the bill to protect our world, create millions of new jobs and restore a strong economy built on a domestic energy future. Let’s work together to prove President Lincoln right.</p>
<p><sup><span style="font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small"><span style="font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small"> </span></span></sup></p>
<p><sup><span style="font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small"> </span></sup><span style="font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nwf.org/2009/08/dirty-politics-for-dirty-fuels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
