Resource managers and conservation practitioners work to preserve, protect, and understand the lands, waters, and wildlife of our country. What do these professionals need in order to address the challenges posed by climate change in their work? We spent a year asking 195 natural and cultural resource managers, conservation practitioners, and researchers this question.

These professionals work along the west coast of North America in the North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NPLCC) region. This is a dynamic and beautiful place filled with dense evergreen forests, spectacular coastlines, some of America’s longest rivers, and such iconic species as salmon, orca, and grizzly bear. While their toolbox is full of strategies and actions applied over the decades, they requested more support to address the particular challenges presented by climate change.

Decision-support systems and tools

By gathering the most relevant documents, data, and other resources in one place, decision-support systems and tools enable managers and decision makers to make more informed decisions. For the managers, conservation practitioners, and researchers we engaged, decision-support systems and tools were the most requested type of support. These systems and tools may include:

• Maps showing where a particular type of habitat is located
• Climate change vulnerability assessments for a specific forest, beach or other location
• Computer- or web-based tools that visualize climate change impacts, alternative ways to respond to impacts, and the pros and cons of choosing one alternative over another

Collaboration and other capacity-building activities

The NPLCC region traverses the Pacific coastline from southern Alaska to northwest California. It crosses state and national boundaries and encompasses federal, tribal, state, and non-governmental jurisdictions. As such, the professionals we engaged emphasized the need to pursue projects and plans that meet the objectives of multiple partners working to address climate change effects on diverse ecosystems. They also emphasized the need to work together to maintain or improve the health and status of the region’s ecosystems over time; in other words, to build or maintain landscape resilience over time. Requested capacity-building activities include:

Bald eagles are found in much of the NPLCC region. Credit: Robert Palmer

• Guidance such as “Best Management Practices” manuals that outline how to incorporate climate change considerations into planning efforts. Or, assessments of the pros and cons of applying new or controversial research to make management decisions.
• Case studies of progress or success in climate change adaptation
• Development of synthesis products, such as an assessment of when, where and under what conditions to use tools for climate change analyses and/or planning. Or, a web-based “climate clearinghouse” that compiles contact information, scientific literature on climate change, and/or an inventory of existing research.
• Facilitation of collaboration among people, projects, institutions, and funding sources

New or different science, data and information

Some data gaps and information needs identified by the managers, conservation practitioners, and researchers we engaged are shared throughout the NPLCC region, while others are particular to a specific location or ecosystem.

The beauty and complexity of the region is breathtaking. This is just the type of system scientists would like to model. Credit: Patricia Tillmann

• Hydrologic data (i.e., water data) in Alaska and British Columbia such as data on how much water flows in a stream per year, per season, per month, or per day.
• Regional and local models of ocean conditions. These may include water temperature, patterns of ocean currents, the level of nutrients in the water, and other conditions.
• Scenarios of climate and socioeconomic conditions, developed in collaboration with decision makers and stakeholders. Scenarios are different but equally possible “visions of the future.” They provide specific descriptions of what the future will look like based on hypothetical (or in some cases, real) decisions made today.

Science communication and outreach

The professionals we engaged identified three audiences for targeted communication and outreach: resource managers, conservation practitioners, and researchers; the public and educators; and, decision makers. They also emphasized that promoting effective science communication and outreach will require targeted messaging and a user-to-consumer approach. Examples of requested communication and outreach needs and activities include:

• Use of visualization tools to communicate climate change effects and examine potentially vulnerable areas
• Making the connection between social, economic, and ecological impacts, especially when communicating with decision makers and the public

Learn more and support our work to build capacity to address climate change

Download the full report: Advancing Landscape-Scale Conservation: An Assessment of Climate Change-Related Challenges, Needs, and Opportunities for the NPLCC (pdf)

Learn more about our work to build capacity to address climate change

Take action in the Pacific Region

Although wildlife aren’t bothered by high food prices, they are just as much affected as humans—if not more—by the climate change driven heat waves, severe droughts and widespread wildfires of this ruined summer. After all, wildlife don’t  buy food at the grocery store.  The extreme weather has unleashed a plague of black bear raids across the country. Black bears are crashing bars, stepping up to the counter at candy stores, cleaning out food pantries and helping themselves to farmer’s crops.

A black bear leading her cubs. USFWS photo.

But who can blame them? They’re staring climate change in the face. The severe drought has devastated their normal wild food sources: acorns, berries and forbs have shriveled up in the extreme heat and drought. As if potential starvation wasn’t a big enough challenge, bears wandering into stores and walking down Main Street are at much greater peril of death than they are running wild in the woods.

The extreme heat and drought, which has broken the record temperatures set during the infamous Dust Bowl in the 1930s,  are harming other wildlife as well.

• Elk and deer are facing severe food shortages. In Utah, the number of hunting permits has been increased to reduce game populations before the long winter. The alternative is starvation.
• Streams as warm as bath water have caused massive fish kills in the Midwest.
• Moose just can’t take the heat…in recent years their populations in Minnesota have crashed.

As reported by The Wall Street Journal, the record low ice cover in the Arctic and the record high ice melt in Greenland aren’t coincidental and are indeed associated with carbon emissions.

It’s dire, but it isn’t over by any means. It is essential that these priority actions be taken:

1. Our nation’s leaders—the President and Congress—must take immediate and meaningful action to reduce our carbon emissions.
2. Wildlife must be safeguarded from climate change.

The National Wildlife Federation has been working hard to reduce carbon emissions and safeguard wildlife, but we can’t do it without your help.

Help ensure the presidential candidates debate their plans  to address climate change before the Nov. 6th election.